NOT KNOWN DETAILS ABOUT HOGDON H335

Not known Details About hogdon h335

Not known Details About hogdon h335

Blog Article

Hogdon nonetheless lists it as slower the 748 on there melt away chart but their on line data shows it much faster. I also study someplace it was soiled....I need to "examine" just before I purchase I assume!

My encounter with CFE223 is actually superior velocity to get a supplied load when compared with other powders, but mediocre precision.

I'm new to reloading myself this yr for rifle. I do have in excess of 6000 rounds less than my belt this 12 months alone,So im however while in the lookup mode for expirence from all resources.

Posted: 5/3/2016 seven:47:forty eight AM EDT [#nine] I have been hoping CFE223 with a few fifty five grain bullets.  Even now working with it.  I can mention that It appears to "feed" pretty well.  I've been using my Hornady Digital powder measure/scale even though Doing the job up my loads.  The CFE223 feeds so rapid the powder evaluate can't properly meter it (the electronic just one).  It gives me regular over alarms.  Even using the mode button to slow down the metering a lot more than location it in "sluggish" does not function.  I've not experimented with it inside the typical powder measure still but expect it would be very consistent. I did, sort of Fortunate really, run across a really precise BLC2 load a couple range visits back.

 My load with Hornady fifty five-gr bullets was fantastic, but his Together with the Noslers (in the Rem seven hundred VS) was not.  Sizzling temps + a bullet that tends to generate additional force + distinctive rifle.  Backing off not less than 0.five to twenty five.five or less would address his pressure issues. In the situation of somebody working with Federal .223 Rem brass that's been pointed out for leading to stress problems because of It truly is thicker partitions and thinner Net area, a decreased load is undoubtedly proposed. This really is why some posters have different effects with loads that are just fantastic for Other folks. Many handloaders who have no way of chronographing their do the job-ups to be a way of getting a deal with on force inside their guns with their elements.  When force symptoms look about the brass and/or primer, then sadly excessive pressure is now current.  Keeping an eye on the chronograph typical velocities allows you are aware of when anticipated optimum velocity has been reached.  In cases like this it would be in the region of 3107 fps should you typical out all 5 resources.    For that reason backing off somewhat will Generally steer clear of this and it is applying superior sense. One good way of acquiring a great tackle on what your restrictions needs to be is to ordinary data from many of the resources you can find.   In cases like this, averaging all 5 resources provides an average most cost body weight of 25 grains at 3107 fps. In the event you were to toss out the "odd" highest charge weight of Hornady and also the "odd" small velocity of Sierra you'd probably get this typical: 25.5 grains at 3134 fps - which I think could well be somewhat much more realistic figures for barrels during the 20-22" range between what I have noticed. That is why I like to refer to as many data sources as feasible right before location objectives for your load do the job-up.  Also, 1 should really investigation and see Should the preferred elements can incorporate to pressure (Federal .223 brass, Nosler Ballistic Recommendations, M193 bullets etcetera.)   Obviously this dialogue just isn't about finding your "precision node" but just demand/stress/velocity goals or ceilings.  Nevertheless in my circumstance, precision would seem to increase with boosts in demand bodyweight when loading H-335.  Start loads like 23 to twenty five grains are only so-so, but loads like 25.five are Superb for me.  I feel that the bullet made use of would make a bigger variance than the cost excess weight. *Although some Take note that 26.0 grains is actually a "5.fifty six NATO-tension" load - Within this specific circumstance it is apparent that genuine 5.fifty six NATO-strain ammo - LC M193 really is way hotter and ninety fps a lot quicker Within this particular AR15.  This may only be recognized with the chronograph or even a force barrel.  

Though the downsides have all been stated earlier mentioned: fairly temperature sensitive, specifically in heat, and really dirty burning. It would carbon up a .223 bore so immediately that following fifty rounds you'd receive the impact from looking at the muzzle the bore wasn't copper fouling.

Quoted: I get bored quickly. I'm wishing to load up some 55gr plinking loads and Preferably develop a inventory pile. Right this moment I am utilizing CFE223 for my 223 loads.

I can show you what hurt.. an extra grain's truly worth of stress without having an additional grain's well worth of velocity.

Plenty of .223 shooters have burned many H335, mainly because for quite a while it had been amongst the greater ball powders available for The task. It metered effectively from a powder measure and usually shot really correctly.

Your reloads may perhaps fit in the Howa website action, but you will have an excessive amount of shoulder clearance which may reduce the accuracy and likewise could result in split conditions across the circumference of the situation.

Quoted: So what's the standards for any plinking load? If you are not chasing the top accuracy then select The most affordable powder and choose it. I doubt you'd see any true variance in any from the powders mention in a very plinking load.

Except you have a pet bench rest load with H335 (difficult to think that) any of the above are going to be just fine with

I am interested in buying up a bolt action .223 and want to make use of my older FMJ ammo for plinking. I don't desire to bring about extreme tension to the rifle or generate any avoidable hurt. Sorry, I'm nonetheless new at this and just want to be Harmless. Thanks ahead of time.

I’ve read through good matters about tac however. I’ve examine it’s superior for lighter bullets? What’s your dude’s load data for tac as well as 55gr’er. Many thanks and sorry, I sense like I submit a lot lol That you are MY ONLY Buddies

Report this page